What Is (and Isn’t) Working among Technology Stocks in 2Q 2024 - Cover Image

What Is (and Isn’t) Working among Technology Stocks in 2Q2024?

06/21/2024

Key Takeaways

Why is [insert name of technology-focused ETF] underperforming in 2024?

This is a recurring question that we are facing in June 2024. Part of the reason is that, while we spend all this time trying to formulate more complete exposures to different technology-oriented thematic equity areas, Nvidia has been performing so strongly that performance so far in 2024 has been determined by:

  • More weight to Nvidia = Stronger performance
  • Less weight to Nvidia = Weaker performance

We readily admit that we even published a blog post focusing on the risk of being “too exposed” to Nvidia within ETF strategies in March 2024 when Nvidia was hitting a market capitalization of $2 trillion. Roughly three months later, we sit looking at Nvidia with a market capitalization of around $3 trillion. If there is a risk, it hasn’t yet materialized in the form of significantly negative returns.

Three Broad-Based Technology-Oriented Thematic ETFs Can Tell Us A Lot

When we think about technology-oriented ETFs in our U.S. thematic range, we tend to discuss:

  • The WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD): This strategy is designed to track the total returns, before fees and expenses, of the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index. This index is rebalanced back to equal weight twice a year and focuses on business-oriented firms that derive more than 50% of their revenues from cloud computing. It is a diversified array of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) companies. Being a software-oriented portfolio, it has no exposure to semiconductor companies.
  • The WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR): This strategy is designed to track the total returns, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. The focus is on pure-play cybersecurity companies that deliver exposure to at least one of eight distinct cybersecurity themes defined by Team8 and monitored at semi-annual rebalances each year. Semiconductors are not a focus in this strategy and have had zero weight historically.

These strategies tend to provide the bulk of their exposure within the software (WCLD and WCBR) and semiconductors (WTAI) industries. While Nvidia is the first semiconductor name that people are thinking about—and have been thinking about for some 18 months—there is a much longer tail of notable companies that can benefit significantly IF consumers and businesses are inspired to update their hardware and buy AI-enabled devices, largely laptops and smartphones. Apple just announced its Apple Intelligence suite of functionality, completing the picture and allowing even those in the Apple universe of products to have this option. 1

It's also interesting that, if one looks at the market performance, it feels like people cannot get far enough away from most software-oriented strategies. WCLD and WCBR, of late, have been running into the wind. However, if people are really excited about AI—essentially, what we will be using the Nvidia chips for—the way in which it will be used is through software. We will also need a lot of cybersecurity solutions to ensure a potentially safer experience.

As we watch the software space today, we are seeking to find those companies that embrace AI and are providing innovative solutions that appear to stack up strongly against the large, generalized foundation models, be it GPT-4o, Microsoft Copilot or Google Gemini, to name a few.

Current Consensus, Forward Guidance and Returns

If we create a list of all the constituents within WTAI, WCLD and WCBR, we can order it based on changes to forward guidance as of the most recent quarterly earnings report. The thinking here is that companies particularly confident in their prospects this year will be raising guidance more significantly, and those really concerned about their prospects will be lowering guidance. When we have read recent reports on earnings announcements, there has been a lot of focus on guidance for the coming quarter and rest of 2024.

Guidance, in a sense, represents a datapoint that bakes in a company’s own forward-looking expectations.

In figure 12:

  • Five of the 10 best forward sales revision firms, post-guidance, were in a semiconductor-related sub-industry. Nvidia was there, but people may not have immediately predicted the presence of Ambarella, Analog Devices, Teradyne or GlobalFoundries. Teradyne, Nvidia and Ambarella delivered double-digit returns seven days after their announcements.
  • The tides of returns in software stocks can change quickly, and we see Monday.com, DigitalOcean, Zscaler and CrowdStrike all raising guidance, at least by a small amount. CrowdStrike and Monday.com each saw their shares up by more than 25% seven days after their announcements.
  • Software-as-a-Service has been tough. UiPath, Fastly and Sprout Social are examples of companies that lowered their revenue guidance in their most recent announcements. Shares of these three companies were all down by more than 35% seven days after this information hit the tape.
  • Of the companies in the 10 Worst Forward Sales Revision group, post-guidance, Salesforce got a significant amount of negative attention—we think too much. Salesforce basically met consensus expectations and then lowered guidance by a small amount. To see a company of this stature—companies that use Salesforce for their client data cannot simply stop on a dime—losing 20% of its market capitalization in one day is a huge move. Maybe one interpretation is that the market wants to see more from Salesforce with respect to generative AI integrations.

Figure 1: Current Consensus, Forward Guidance and Returns, as of June 11, 2024

Sources: WisdomTree, FactSet. As of 6/11/24, we sought companies within WTAI, WCLD or WCBR as constituents and looked at their most recent
earnings announcement, any change to forward guidance, and subsequent returns from that announcement to try to gauge reaction to that
specific announcement. Holdings subject to change.

Conclusion: The AI Megatrend Is Bigger than Nvidia

It’s possible that market participants are starting to believe that nothing is bigger than Nvidia. We are always keeping in mind that building out compute infrastructure is merely one step within the AI journey. The bigger and more important step involves thinking about what we will be using all of this compute infrastructure for.

In the near term, we have seen companies announcing an array of options for those looking for AI-enabled smartphones. Samsung, Apple and Google are all tossing their respective hats into the ring. Additionally, AI is starting to be infused into the operating system of new laptops and tablets. We are watching the sales figures for these devices because if we see significant sales in 2024 heading into 2025, it goes a long way to making AI ubiquitous. It will make using AI-enabled applications become more normalized and speed the transition to the next stage of computing. We’ll also have to keep thinking about cybersecurity throughout.

WTAI, WCLD and WCBR, albeit in different ways, capture different parts of this technological evolution.

 

 

1 Source: “Apple Intelligence Preview.” Apple, www.apple.com/apple-intelligence/.

2 Sources: WisdomTree, FactSet. As of 6/11/24, we sought companies within WTAI, WCLD or WCBR as constituents and looked at their most recent earnings announcement, any change to forward guidance and subsequent returns from that announcement to try to gauge reaction to that specific announcement.


Register to get insights from WisdomTree
Individual investors who register can access dashboard, daily blog posts, latest videos, podcasts and stay current with industry insights. On top of that, Financial Professionals get additional access to the tools, technology, resources and support they need to take the business to the next level.

Important Risks Related to this Article

For current Fund holdings, please click the respective ticker: WTAI, WCLD, WCBR. Holdings are subject to risk and change.

WTAI: There are risks associated with investing, including the possible loss of principal. The Fund invests in companies primarily involved in the investment theme of artificial intelligence (AI) and innovation. Companies engaged in AI typically face intense competition and potentially rapid product obsolescence. These companies are also heavily dependent on intellectual property rights and may be adversely affected by loss or impairment of those rights. Additionally, AI companies typically invest significant amounts of spending on research and development, and there is no guarantee that the products or services produced by these companies will be successful. Companies that are capitalizing on innovation and developing technologies to displace older technologies or create new markets may not be successful. The Fund invests in the securities included in, or representative of, its Index regardless of their investment merit and the Fund does not attempt to outperform its Index or take defensive positions in declining markets. The composition of the Index is governed by an Index Committee and the Index may not perform as intended. Please read the Fund’s prospectus for specific details regarding the Fund’s risk profile.

WCLD: There are risks associated with investing, including the possible loss of principal. The Fund invests in cloud computing companies, which are heavily dependent on the internet and utilizing a distributed network of servers over the internet. Cloud computing companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel and are subject to the risks of changes in business cycles, world economic growth, technological progress and government regulation. These companies typically face intense competition and potentially rapid product obsolescence. Additionally, many cloud computing companies store sensitive consumer information and could be the target of cybersecurity attacks and other types of theft, which could have a negative impact on these companies and the Fund. Securities of cloud computing companies tend to be more volatile than securities of companies that rely less heavily on technology and, specifically, on the internet. Cloud computing companies can typically engage in significant amounts of spending on research and development, and rapid changes to the field could have a material adverse effect on a company’s operating results. The composition of the Index is heavily dependent on quantitative and qualitative information and data from one or more third parties and the Index may not perform as intended. Please read the Fund’s prospectus for specific details regarding the Fund’s risk profile.

WCBR: There are risks associated with investing, including the possible loss of principal. The Fund invests in cybersecurity companies, which generate a meaningful part of their revenue from security protocols that prevent intrusion and attacks to systems, networks, applications, computers and mobile devices. Cybersecurity companies are particularly vulnerable to rapid changes in technology, rapid obsolescence of products and services, the loss of patent, copyright and trademark protections, government regulation and competition, both domestically and internationally. Cybersecurity company stocks, especially those which are internet related, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations in the past that have often been unrelated to their operating performance. These companies may also be smaller and less experienced companies, with limited product or service lines, markets or financial resources and fewer experienced management or marketing personnel. The Fund invests in the securities included in, or representative of, its Index regardless of their investment merit and the Fund does not attempt to outperform its Index or take defensive positions in declining markets. The composition of the Index is heavily dependent on quantitative and qualitative information and data from one or more third parties, and the Index may not perform as intended. Please read the Fund’s prospectus for specific details regarding the Fund’s risk profile.


Back Arrow IconPrevious Post All Blog Posts Menu IconAll Posts Next Post

About the Contributor

Global Head of Research

Christopher Gannatti began at WisdomTree as a Research Analyst in December 2010, working directly with Jeremy Schwartz, CFA®, Director of Research. In January of 2014, he was promoted to Associate Director of Research where he was responsible to lead different groups of analysts and strategists within the broader Research team at WisdomTree. In February of 2018, Christopher was promoted to Head of Research, Europe, where he was based out of WisdomTree’s London office and was responsible for the full WisdomTree research effort within the European market, as well as supporting the UCITs platform globally. In November 2021, Christopher was promoted to Global Head of Research, now responsible for numerous communications on investment strategy globally, particularly in the thematic equity space. Christopher came to WisdomTree from Lord Abbett, where he worked for four and a half years as a Regional Consultant. He received his MBA in Quantitative Finance, Accounting, and Economics from NYU’s Stern School of Business in 2010, and he received his bachelor’s degree from Colgate University in Economics in 2006. Christopher is a holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst Designation.